What kind of coupler do you like?


Willis, as far as the Dummy couplers. I really don't know how long the Shanks are so as too whether or not you can leave them in the Truck mounts
Hi bob, thank's they are about the same length in the shank as a #5 Kadee with just about as big mounting hole. The truck coupler pin is less than 1/16" and the diameter of the hole in the dummy coupler shank is about 1/8" not a very good match. I made a little centering washer and it's now mounted on a truck. The first was the most difficult the next ones should be easy now that I know how to do it. Spent a lot of time coming up with a 1/8" diameter washer with a 1/16 dia. center hole.
Cheers Willis
 
Are they making 58's in various shank length and shank centering? O rcould you wind up with a 58 on one end of a loco and a normal size kadee on the other end?
 
Not yet....But they have been "thinking" about it.

Be Wise Beware Be Safe
"Mountain Goat" Greg

only 2 1/2 hours away from Kadee international HQ's
 
I just got a batch of #118s (the shelf couplers), so I'm retrofitting the tank cars that have #58s now. According to the instructions, you can simulate Type H titelocks (passenger car couplers) by cutting off the top and bottom shelfs, so that might be another retrofit to the passenger car fleet (at least those from 1950 onwards).....

:D

Kennedy
 
JeffShultz said:
So, how do the #118's compare to the 58's in size?

Way bigger. The pamphlet says they're even bigger than the #5s in just the coupler face size. It also warns of interface problems with mounting locations (like diaphragms on passenger cars).

Kadee says that they're functional to the extent if you have crappy trackwork, the cars may not uncouple on their own. Plus, they won't uncouple automatically when you pick up a car; you have to twist it slightly.

Kennedy
 
:confused: Ok! you mounted #58's because they are more realistic looking than the #5's, now you are replacing the #58's with #118's which are much less realistic looking than the #5's. What am I missing here? Surely you don't have crappy trackwork.
Cheers Willis
 
Well, the trackwork isn't the best, but I don't have any uncoupling problems with the #58s now, so it's not real, real bad. But, by cutting off the shelfs on the 118, it will be very similar to the Type H Passenger car coupler.

Regarding size, the brochure says the scale size of the 118 is direct from the actual prototype Type SF coupler drawings. Have not yet reconciled the apparent differences between that statement, and the ostensible prototype dimensional issues with the #58. I don't know the prototype relation to the #58.

Kennedy
 
by cutting off the shelfs on the 118, it will be very similar to the Type H Passenger car coupler.
Hi Kenedy, well I guess you know what you're doing :D, and I'll have to log onto the Kadee site and have a look see. For me I'm still doing the dummy couplers with the hoppers.
Cheers Willis
 
I forgot to mention a couple of things. The insert says that the dimensions on the 118 is scale to the prototype Type F. However, they DID NOT say that it was scale to HO scale. What this may mean is that while the dimensions are in line with each other, it's not a true HO scale coupler. This could be due to practical operating/manufacturing issues.

The second thing is that I don't know what the prototype dimensions of a Type E (which may be what the #58 is) are, nor the Type F. The Type E is standard, but the Type F is an alternate standard, with or without shelfs. The Type F may be dimensionally larger, but that would introduce knuckle interoperability issues for those cars still using the Type E.

Kennedy
 
ok guys i am a newbe here so hi all. i have just left the couplers that came with the rolling stock and motive power on and ran them.

but from what i gather from this thread is that the kadee stay coupled better so how hard are thay to install and any specal tools needed to do it and do thay uncouple like the stock ones or do they reqire something specal to uncouple them.
 
Hi emt49 and welcome to the ModelRailroadForums. As you have read in the posts everyone has their own ideas and ways of doing things, and when they are discussed here on the forum, hopefully everyone comes away from the discussion with some new knowledge to make things easier for themselves. I would say the Kadee magnetic couplers are probably the most popular of the brands. Coupling is achieved when two so equipped cars come together. Uncoupling can be done manualy or magneticaly.
Here are a couple of links that may be of some help to you and explain the coupler operation
http://www.mgsharp.com/Kadee_HO_Couplers.htm a bit on installation of Kadees, the prices are in English pounds but these products are available on the American continent. It also shows a tool set, some things are somewhat necessary to do a decent job of installation and some are a convenience. Your decision I guess

http://www.kadee.com/index.shtml Kadee's home page lot's of information here. Click on the "How the Couplers Work" link and there is an animated display

Hope it helps, after you read the pages you can ask some more questions about specific problems.

Tools for me are Kadee Coupler Height gauge, needle nose pliars, tap and die set with drill bits for 2-56 screws and a home made height gauge and a decent quality vernier guage.
Cheers Willis
 
I Am Confused

RCH said:
I have a few unit trains (grain and coal) that I've equipped with #58s and Walthers dummy couplers at a 1:2 ratio. In other words, in a six car cut where "A" is a car equipped with Kadee #58s on each end and "B" is a car with dummy couplers on each end, the cut is assembled like this:

A B B B B A

Kadee #5s don't fit quite as well with the dummy couplers, so they've been removed from the unit trains. The dummy couplers look great, they couple tightly which reduces slack significantly, and they're really inexpensive.

.

You can couple dummy couplers????? :confused: :confused: I thought that since they were "dummy" couplers that they couldn't really couple!!!!! :confused: I thought that dummy couplers were more of a looks thing than functional, like dummy locomotive, which you can add to a train to make it look like there were several locomotives pulling the train, when there is really only one or two engines actually pulling the train, isn't it the same with dummy couplers, that they are there to make it look like there is a real functional coupler there, when really it is only a non-functional dummy coupler!?!?!?!?!?! :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:


COULD SOMEONE PLEASE STRAIGHTEN THIS ISSUE OUT FOR ME???????
 
Hi Eric, LOL yes I can understand your confusion. Perhaps the name dummy coupler is a misnomer and could be called Non Operating couplers instead. The knuckles do not open or close, however they do FIT together in a coupled position. They have to be physically coupled and uncoupled by hand and while performing this operation thats where at least one of the cars will be during the operation.
The photo isn't too clear but the best I could at the moment two couple together and two uncoupled

13.gif
Willis
 
Wow old thread alive again... I'm now convinced the Sergent Enineering EC87's are the GOD of all couplers!
 
jbaakko said:
Wow old thread alive again... I'm now convinced the Sergent Enineering EC87's are the GOD of all couplers!
I like what I see, but I can't get my hands on any! :mad: Last time I was at their site it said they were completely out of everything. It looks like they have them back in stock now though (?). Where did you get yours? Is ordering directly from them the only way to get them?
 
Well if anyone is interested I got mine from a hoby shop, Walther's Dummy Couplers 93-1045 theres a little mold flashing on some that requires a little file work, but I'm happy with them :D

13.gif
Willis
 



Back
Top