arealgijoe
Member
Last month I picked up a very nice CNW passenger car set at the Wheaton Ill train show.
I found a very nice LOOKING ConCor DL-109a loco & dummy A, in the CNW scheme on Ebay.
The seller, peggyg3460 (also used name of Dennis in one eMail) had claimed "RANS GOOD". ConCor diesels rarely do not run very good (or don't run in my experience). It ran very jerky and nothing like I ever experienced with any running ConCor. I eMailed the seller questioning if thye actually test ran this loco. (my note; it would be easy to assume (w/o testing) it ran well just being a ConCor and looked NEW). The seller emailed me and assured me they actually test ran it and it was good. The was no evidence of shipping damage or even the box had been dropped etc. It was well packed.
The problem seemed to be one or both trucks, so, I swapped trucks with an old PA-1. That cleared up most of the problem. Next I looked and played with the problem trucks and found that there was one spot on the main truck gear that would catch and bind, that explained the jerkiness. It took a bit of time and effort but I finally found a piece of plastic/nylon gear partly filling the void between 2 teeth. One truck and TWO fragments in one spot. These bits were solidly attached to the gear, I guess a molding issue or failure to clean it up before being assembled. I was going to just swap the main gears with one from the old PA-1 (made in Japan), but the center pins (new?? made in China) did not have the same diameter so not interchangeable. I had to take a sharp Xacto blade to cut the flash/bits out and clear the gear.
After that it ran better but still not right despite the jerkiness being fixed. I found 2 thin plastic shims in the motor section and removal of them again made it run even better, & acceptable, just not typical ConCor.
This specific loco could never have "RANS GOOD" (seller used CAPS) it was defective from its day of MFG. IN my eMails to the seller I gave them an out that maybe they simply over-looked test running this one. The seller assured me otherwise. Bottom line is they either had NO CLUE how a N scale loco runs (even a cheapo Yugo made) or they lied about it, I do not know.
I filed a not as described case and the seller offered to take back the NOW REPAIRED loco with me eating the time, effort and return shipping cost. I put hours into finding and fixing the problems, more than it's worth (my fault). Since I would again be looking for a CNW DL-109, if I returned it, some else might buy it then put it back on eBay and I could end up with the same defective loco yet again. At least that was my personal logic.
I left honest and fair neg-feedback. The seller was NOT happy, but others should be made aware their claim of testing and "RANS GOOD" is a crap shoot at best, it might and might not run good, if at all. I think potential buyers should be aware. The loco I got was made in China, not Japan, so that may be part of the reason/problem.
Here is what the seller wants (demands?) I return the locos, pwr & dummy, at MY cost and eat the time, trouble/work I put into repairing it, plus withdraw my honest & fair feedback & and CLOSE the case. I did get a pair of very nice NEW shells, was able to repair the loco so its useable, just out more money and work than I should have. BTW after fixing the loco I installed Dgitrax DCC in it. IT now runs good enough for my needs and looks great with my cars.
I am inclined to just let the case time out, leave the fair neg-feedback in place to protect others.
What do YOU think?
JD
I found a very nice LOOKING ConCor DL-109a loco & dummy A, in the CNW scheme on Ebay.
The seller, peggyg3460 (also used name of Dennis in one eMail) had claimed "RANS GOOD". ConCor diesels rarely do not run very good (or don't run in my experience). It ran very jerky and nothing like I ever experienced with any running ConCor. I eMailed the seller questioning if thye actually test ran this loco. (my note; it would be easy to assume (w/o testing) it ran well just being a ConCor and looked NEW). The seller emailed me and assured me they actually test ran it and it was good. The was no evidence of shipping damage or even the box had been dropped etc. It was well packed.
The problem seemed to be one or both trucks, so, I swapped trucks with an old PA-1. That cleared up most of the problem. Next I looked and played with the problem trucks and found that there was one spot on the main truck gear that would catch and bind, that explained the jerkiness. It took a bit of time and effort but I finally found a piece of plastic/nylon gear partly filling the void between 2 teeth. One truck and TWO fragments in one spot. These bits were solidly attached to the gear, I guess a molding issue or failure to clean it up before being assembled. I was going to just swap the main gears with one from the old PA-1 (made in Japan), but the center pins (new?? made in China) did not have the same diameter so not interchangeable. I had to take a sharp Xacto blade to cut the flash/bits out and clear the gear.
After that it ran better but still not right despite the jerkiness being fixed. I found 2 thin plastic shims in the motor section and removal of them again made it run even better, & acceptable, just not typical ConCor.
This specific loco could never have "RANS GOOD" (seller used CAPS) it was defective from its day of MFG. IN my eMails to the seller I gave them an out that maybe they simply over-looked test running this one. The seller assured me otherwise. Bottom line is they either had NO CLUE how a N scale loco runs (even a cheapo Yugo made) or they lied about it, I do not know.
I filed a not as described case and the seller offered to take back the NOW REPAIRED loco with me eating the time, effort and return shipping cost. I put hours into finding and fixing the problems, more than it's worth (my fault). Since I would again be looking for a CNW DL-109, if I returned it, some else might buy it then put it back on eBay and I could end up with the same defective loco yet again. At least that was my personal logic.
I left honest and fair neg-feedback. The seller was NOT happy, but others should be made aware their claim of testing and "RANS GOOD" is a crap shoot at best, it might and might not run good, if at all. I think potential buyers should be aware. The loco I got was made in China, not Japan, so that may be part of the reason/problem.
Here is what the seller wants (demands?) I return the locos, pwr & dummy, at MY cost and eat the time, trouble/work I put into repairing it, plus withdraw my honest & fair feedback & and CLOSE the case. I did get a pair of very nice NEW shells, was able to repair the loco so its useable, just out more money and work than I should have. BTW after fixing the loco I installed Dgitrax DCC in it. IT now runs good enough for my needs and looks great with my cars.
I am inclined to just let the case time out, leave the fair neg-feedback in place to protect others.
What do YOU think?
JD