Guess I am confused ... What was the 6 axle GE that had the War Bonnet paint used on their passenger runs?
That was the U28CG.
Here's a link to a review a friend of mine did:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZhXh2V0muE
Guess I am confused ... What was the 6 axle GE that had the War Bonnet paint used on their passenger runs?
Ray,
According to our vet, it seems the commercial cat foods are killing the cats. My Midnight is also diabetic, and requires 2 injections of Lantus® each day. Our vet is real "natural diet" stressor , but at 17 and 6 Midnight and Tink love their dry food. Now the youngest cat, Tumbles (4) eats very little dry food, but eats a large amount of cooked chicken. He goes through 3-4 complete breasts in a week. He bloodwork is great, and the muscle he is starting to pile on is amazing for his small frame. Now if I can just get him to stop doing this crap!
Good morning. I planned to post this photo last night but decided to wait since the focus was on a more somber topic.
This is what I have gotten done with my windowless caboose scratch-bashing project so far: All the main body pieces are ready for assembly. I did the cupola on Saturday and, as expected, some of the pieces didn't line up perfectly so I had to redo them. I applied the rivet decals and handrails beforehand, since the surfaces would be easier to reach - and it is much safer to press into a flat piece of styrene with a pin vice than trying to drill into a fragile newly-assembled body since it's not as tough as an injection-molded piece.
Back to the layout room today and hopefully start my ballast project that I intended to do yesterday. I was side tracked by two DCC locomotives whose decoders were acting up!
One locomotive's bell was not always operating and then the horn wasn't working. The other locomotive would run at one speed step and then increase its speed. Simply reprogramming their addresses cured the problem.
Lost a small truck screw on the floor, found it and them lost the other.
Greg
Good morning, everyone. I'll take a big cup of regular, please. It's 54 with a chance o' rain here in SW MO; heading for mid 60's today, 70's rest of the week before a slight cooldown this weekend.
David - Yeah, I understand about not nailing those spikes too hard. I'm being careful.
The first run was greeted by cheers and high fives from several family members present for the big moment. And as soon as I get a curved turnout in my latest MBKlein order, I'll be laying track for the next few weeks.
Nothing new from the train room. Well, that's not entirely true - - last night I went out to my wood shop and started building a control center for the layout. I also have a couple of kits to build, but no progress there lately - too excited and busy gluing down roadbed scenery.
See ya later. have a good day, everyone.
Johnny
Colorado & Southern’s Extra 700D North left Utah Junction in Denver at 6:15 a.m., en route to Cheyenne, Wyo., with 4 F units and a 52-car train. Coming against it, only a minute or two late, was passenger train No. 30 from Billings, Mont. The train dispatcher chose not to set a meeting point between the trains, so Extra 700D North was required to clear No. 30 five or more minutes before the passenger train was scheduled past a siding.
Surviving crew members of the freight said later that they expected their train to clear No. 30 at Semper, Colo., 5.7 miles north of Utah Junction. The fireman said that near Utah Junction he asked the engineer where they would take siding but got no satisfactory answer.
Louis ... Since you like history, I'll keep that in mind. Other Coffee Shop patrons are knowledgable about railroad history, too. ...... I mentioned there was an SD9 in the collision with was rebuilt and became the fist SD9 in the Chinese Red paint scheme. It has more history after that which is interesting. I'll check the details.
U25's leaving GE factory. Not yet delivered to CB&Q.
Louis ..... Here is a commentary in Trains Magazine by Fred Frailey. ... The tragic accident involving 700D is a mystery.
"Now go to Jan. 23, 1958. Colorado & Southern’s Extra 700D North left Utah Junction in Denver at 6:15 a.m., en route to Cheyenne, Wyo., with 4 F units and a 52-car train. Coming against it, only a minute or two late, was passenger train No. 30 from Billings, Mont. The train dispatcher chose not to set a meeting point between the trains, so Extra 700D North was required to clear No. 30 five or more minutes before the passenger train was scheduled past a siding.
Surviving crew members of the freight said later that they expected their train to clear No. 30 at Semper, Colo., 5.7 miles north of Utah Junction. The fireman said that near Utah Junction he asked the engineer where they would take siding but got no satisfactory answer. The engineer made a service application of the brakes approaching Semper, then released them and continued on, passing the south siding switch at 6:38 a.m., or 15 minutes before No. 30’s scheduled time. Quoting the accident report: “The fireman said he immediately warned the engineer that they should have taken siding at Semper. The engineer replied that they had sufficient time.” A crew member radioed from the caboose, asking where their train would clear No. 30. The engineer replied they would go to Broomfield, five miles north of Semper.
The fireman said he continued to warn the engineer that they would not clear Broomfield before No. 30’s 6:47 a.m. time, and was ignored. The conductor testified that he radioed the engineer instructions to stop their train at once and provide flag protection for the front of the train. The engineer did not comply. Thinking he may have overlooked something in their train orders, the conductor reread them. Finding nothing, he radioed the engineer as their train approached Broomfield that he would set the brakes from the caboose. At the time, Extra 700D North was passing the south siding switch of Broomfield without stopping. As the conductor was about to activate his brake valve, the two trains collided near the Broomfield depot, the passenger train doing 20 mph and the freight 30.
Both occupants of the cab of No. 30 were killed, as was the engineer of Extra 700D North. The ICC concluded that the collision occurred because the inferior train occupied the main track on the time of a superior train. But again, you’re left to wonder why.
I’ve reread this report numerous times over the years. What was the engineer really thinking? Given the repeated warnings by other crew members and his evasive or nonchalant replies — and given that he didn’t even slow his train as it came to the place he said he would take the siding — I can only conclude that he wished to die."
Good mornin, on my 2nd cup of joe and reading Garrys article.. Wow, I wonder why life was so bad to do himself in and to take others down as well (hmm.. there could be another reason we will never know...)Louis ..... Here is a commentary in Trains Magazine by Fred Frailey. ... The tragic accident involving 700D is a mystery.
"Now go to Jan. 23, 1958. Colorado & Southern’s Extra 700D North left Utah Junction in Denver at 6:15 a.m., en route to Cheyenne, Wyo., with 4 F units and a 52-car train. Coming against it, only a minute or two late, was passenger train No. 30 from Billings, Mont. The train dispatcher chose not to set a meeting point between the trains, so Extra 700D North was required to clear No. 30 five or more minutes before the passenger train was scheduled past a siding.
Surviving crew members of the freight said later that they expected their train to clear No. 30 at Semper, Colo., 5.7 miles north of Utah Junction. The fireman said that near Utah Junction he asked the engineer where they would take siding but got no satisfactory answer. The engineer made a service application of the brakes approaching Semper, then released them and continued on, passing the south siding switch at 6:38 a.m., or 15 minutes before No. 30’s scheduled time. Quoting the accident report: “The fireman said he immediately warned the engineer that they should have taken siding at Semper. The engineer replied that they had sufficient time.” A crew member radioed from the caboose, asking where their train would clear No. 30. The engineer replied they would go to Broomfield, five miles north of Semper.
The fireman said he continued to warn the engineer that they would not clear Broomfield before No. 30’s 6:47 a.m. time, and was ignored. The conductor testified that he radioed the engineer instructions to stop their train at once and provide flag protection for the front of the train. The engineer did not comply. Thinking he may have overlooked something in their train orders, the conductor reread them. Finding nothing, he radioed the engineer as their train approached Broomfield that he would set the brakes from the caboose. At the time, Extra 700D North was passing the south siding switch of Broomfield without stopping. As the conductor was about to activate his brake valve, the two trains collided near the Broomfield depot, the passenger train doing 20 mph and the freight 30.
Both occupants of the cab of No. 30 were killed, as was the engineer of Extra 700D North. The ICC concluded that the collision occurred because the inferior train occupied the main track on the time of a superior train. But again, you’re left to wonder why.
I’ve reread this report numerous times over the years. What was the engineer really thinking? Given the repeated warnings by other crew members and his evasive or nonchalant replies — and given that he didn’t even slow his train as it came to the place he said he would take the siding — I can only conclude that he wished to die."
Good morning guys. The forecast for today was dense fog in the morning so I opted to work from home for a few hours then go in to the office for a meeting about 1030.
Well, turns out, the forecast was wrong, but I got some work done anyway.