ModelRailroadForums.com

Go Back   ModelRailroadForums.com > General Discussions > General Discussions

RailroadForums.com - Railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

RailroadForums.com
RR Forum - Photo Gallery
Railroad Links

ModelRailroadForums.com - Model railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

ModelRailroadForums.com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Model Railroad Links

SteamPreservation.com - Steam and railway preservation discussion forum and photo gallery

SteamPreservation.Com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Tourist RR Links - Spotters Guide

Model RR Supplier Directory
Model Railroad Links

Model RR Product Reviews

RailroadBookstore.com - Railroad Books
Model Railroad Books  - Thomas & Friends


Share this on your favorite Social Network:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-2005, 11:55 PM
gp80mac's Avatar
gp80mac gp80mac is offline
edito, ergo BOOM.
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Columbia, PA
Posts: 17
Default Small layout - HO or N?

Hey folks:

I have this shelf, and potential top-of-bureau space in my room. All told it is about six feet long, and 2-3 feet wide. (The shelf is 3 foot wide, the top of bureau 2 foot - although I may hang a shelf to elongate that 2)

This space has been screaming for a model RR for awhile. I have dabbled in some HO in years past..mostly junk, and never estabished a completed "layout". Now with a couple weeks off coming up, I think it may be time to do something about it. But I'm at a stumbling block.

I was originally thinking of building a small HO switching layout - since I have a P2K GP9 and a couple buildings. But then again, I have been looking towards N more and more, and having no experience with it at all, I was wondering if you can easily do switching with N?


Right now, I seem to be leaning towards an HO layout, and trying to see if I can add a few more feet to that six. I'll post a diagram of what I have later... but was wondering if anyone has any insights on how they decided between a small N or HO layout? (Or how you would decide if given the chance) Sorry if this sounds I'm rambling...but typing these things out seems to help me decide.

Thanks,
Tom.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:10 AM
grande man's Avatar
grande man grande man is offline
Bonafied Grande Nut
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,214
Default

Tom, based on your space constraints, I'd vote for N. I don't have any experience with the scale though so maybe someone will post that has. You could do a small HO switching RR with no problem, but N scale would give you many more track plan options.
__________________
On the Grande in 1965...
D&RGW Platte Canyon Sub Virtual Tour
http://www.modelrailroadforums.com/f...ead.php?t=1876

D&RGW Platte Canyon Sub Photo Album
http://ericmcferrin.smugmug.com/Hobb...33433862_AKsmT

Wishing you all green boards, Eric
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-13-2005, 05:29 AM
RexHea's Avatar
RexHea RexHea is offline
RAIL BENDER
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Posts: 4,774
Default

Tom, I agree fully with Grande man. You can do a lot with N gauge in the space you are talking about, but other than some fancy switching arangements, HO scale would be limited in both operations and scenery. Have you thought about N gauge mounted on a door? Many do this.
__________________
REX
Blue Creek & Warrior Railways (circu 1950's)
"Connecting the South"


Click--> Sorry, Coming soon!

Last edited by RexHea; 12-13-2005 at 05:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-13-2005, 05:48 AM
dgwinup dgwinup is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 195
Default

N scale is a great choice when space is limited. Coupling and un-coupling is more difficult, even if you convert everything to MT couplers. MT's work really well, but the uncoupling magnets are a little tricky to install correctly. Other than that, N scale would be a great choice for you.

3' is wide enough for a loop that will look good. 2' is a little too narrow unless you can hide a large part of the curve to disguise how sharp the turn is. Still have lots of options with N scale. With HO, you're looking at a straight switching layout.

But then, I'm prejudiced, having been in N scale since 1968!!

Darrell, the "old man" of N scale, quiet...for now
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-13-2005, 02:48 PM
CBCNSfan's Avatar
CBCNSfan CBCNSfan is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 4,421
Default

Hi tom, I agree with the above posts in that "N" would be a better choice for you. Think about it 3 x 6 ft. in "N" is about the equivelant of 6 x 12 in HO, but with "N" you have the added convenience of being able to reach everything on the layout.

Cheers Willis
__________________
REMEMBER, GROWING OLDER IS MANDATORY.
GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL.


My CB&CNS Rwy. HO Layout
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-13-2005, 03:57 PM
CSX_road_slug's Avatar
CSX_road_slug CSX_road_slug is offline
Steel Mill Watcher
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 3,553
Default

Tom,

I'm casting my vote with the others. N scale has come so far from where it was even 10 years ago, in terms of detailing and loco performance; I sometimes wish I'd gone that route myself, but I'm already so heavily invested in HO that I'd have to start over from ground zero.

Now's your chance to start fresh, go for it!
__________________
- ken in Maryland

Former CSX modeler, now returning to B&O.
Sure wish I could change my username, but I don't want to sacrifice my post count..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-14-2005, 04:51 AM
gp80mac's Avatar
gp80mac gp80mac is offline
edito, ergo BOOM.
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Columbia, PA
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBCNSfan
Think about it 3 x 6 ft. in "N" is about the equivelant of 6 x 12 in HO,

Wasn't thinking about that... that's a decent sized layout then. I may even be able to push that six feet out further so...6 X 16, or dare I say 6 X 20?

Time will tell.

Thanks for the input guys. I'll keep everyone updated.

Tom.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-14-2005, 05:03 AM
jdavid93225's Avatar
jdavid93225 jdavid93225 is offline
Switchman
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 40
Default

Well, I guess I'll jump on the bandwagon here, too! I am also going to recommend N gauge for the same reasons mentioned above. If I were going to do it all over again, I too, would go that route. Since I have a significant investment in HO, though, I figure I should just stay with it. If you only have a little bit of HO equipment, now would be the time to make the switch (as in switching layout-pun intended). The possibilities for what you can do in N gauge are far less restricted than they are with HO.

As for a switching layout, I would recommend going with DCC whether you choose N or HO. With DCC, you have much more control over what your locomotives are doing, and you have the ability to control multiple locomotives easily. DCC allows much greater flexibility when it comes to switching, so I would recommend it highly.
__________________
The number one rule of model railroading: have fun!

Joseph David
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




Model Railroad Bookstore

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PHP_EOL