ModelRailroadForums.com

Go Back   ModelRailroadForums.com > Scale Specific Discussions > HO Scale

RailroadForums.com - Railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

RailroadForums.com
RR Forum - Photo Gallery
Railroad Links

ModelRailroadForums.com - Model railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

ModelRailroadForums.com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Model Railroad Links

SteamPreservation.com - Steam and railway preservation discussion forum and photo gallery

SteamPreservation.Com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Tourist RR Links - Spotters Guide

Model RR Supplier Directory
Model Railroad Links

Model RR Product Reviews

RailroadBookstore.com - Railroad Books
Model Railroad Books  - Thomas & Friends


Share this on your favorite Social Network:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-26-2012, 12:40 PM
DianneB DianneB is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 20
Default Coupler confusion!

I have been away from the hobby over 30 years and much has changed. Now, with retirement, I am putting together a backwoods logging road with a couple of Shays and planned to build my own 40' skeleton logging cars from steel (for weight) and wood with Archbar trucks but I am bewildered by the huge array of couplers! I will need couplers and pockets and like the idea of the "delayed magnetic" couplers but there are still so many options that I don't know what to buy.

Being retired, price is a factor and I would like to build as many cars as I can for the dollars spent on couplers and trucks.

What is the best coupler for the money?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-26-2012, 02:23 PM
waltr waltr is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 527
Default

Layout idea sounds real good. Do check out the Pinnacle Creek build thread.

Quote:
What is the best coupler for the money?
Kadee
http://www.kadee.com/htmbord/coupler.htm

Is this Standard gauge HO? Then Kadee #5 couples would work well and have the delayed magnetic action. Buy them in bulk and the price per coupler is lower. These are available with coupler pockets and work great on scratch built cars.

For a closer to scale couple the Kadee #58 or #158 are good.

For Log cars Kadee has the #115 coupler box that fits the #148 coupler:
http://www.kadee.com/htmbord/page115.htm
__________________
My layout build thread
http://www.modelrailroadforums.com/f...ad.php?t=27884
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-26-2012, 02:27 PM
cv_acr's Avatar
cv_acr cv_acr is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sarnia, ON
Posts: 369
Default

There are a number of manufacturers that make magnetic knuckle couplers (Kadee, McHenry, Bachman, etc.) fortunately these are all compatible with each other. Kadee is the original, and the gold standard. The others are all copies of the Kadee design.

Kadee's couplers are metal, most of the clones are plastic and not as robust.

Kadee has a wide range of different variations, but there is basically one or two standard versions, and everything else is a variation to fit particular situations. (Higher or lower heads, longer or shorter shafts, integrated whisker springs, narrow "scale" mounting box, etc.)

The original standard coupler is the Kadee #5. Kadee also has a #58 with a smaller, more "scale" head, which looks a lot better. Everything else from Kadee is a variation on one of the above two couplers. I think that the Bachman and McHenry plastic couplers roughly match the scale-size #58.

There are two other types of HO scale couplers, the old classic "horn-hook", which doesn't look remotely like any sort of real coupler, and the Sergeant coupler, which is designed to look and operate almost exactly like a real coupler. Neither of these are compatible with the other common HO knuckle couplers.
__________________
Chris vanderHeide
Sarnia, ON

http://canadianfreightcargallery.ca
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-26-2012, 09:45 PM
Rico's Avatar
Rico Rico is offline
BN Modeller
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MB
Posts: 3,650
Default

I agree with the Kadee #5 and #58's.
I've seen guys who take the Tyco style couplers and shave them down to look closer to a proto coupler, sort of a "good enough for now" thing.
Can't get any cheaper than that!
__________________
Fines are like taxes for doing wrong.
Taxes are like fines for doing right.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-27-2012, 02:23 AM
DianneB DianneB is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 20
Default

Okay, #58s it is! Ordered a mess of couplers, draft boxes, and the first batch of archbar trucks.

I have been following the Pinnacle Creek build thread and will undoubtedly be stealing some of his ideas

Thanks for the thoughts folks!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-2012, 09:10 AM
sd24b sd24b is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: colorado
Posts: 161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waltr View Post
Layout idea sounds real good. Do check out the Pinnacle Creek build thread.


Kadee
http://www.kadee.com/htmbord/coupler.htm

Is this Standard gauge HO? Then Kadee #5 couples would work well and have the delayed magnetic action. Buy them in bulk and the price per coupler is lower. These are available with coupler pockets and work great on scratch built cars.

For a closer to scale couple the Kadee #58 or #158 are good.

For Log cars Kadee has the #115 coupler box that fits the #148 coupler:
http://www.kadee.com/htmbord/page115.htm
Kadee hands down. The clones are ok if not pulling long or heavy trains. However, they don't hold up well with hard coupling. Avoid the clones with the flat knucle springs. and don't forget a coupler gauge. Phil
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




Model Railroad Bookstore

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PHP_EOL