ModelRailroadForums.com

Go Back   ModelRailroadForums.com > Scale Specific Discussions > HO Scale

RailroadForums.com - Railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

RailroadForums.com
RR Forum - Photo Gallery
Railroad Links

ModelRailroadForums.com - Model railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

ModelRailroadForums.com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Model Railroad Links

SteamPreservation.com - Steam and railway preservation discussion forum and photo gallery

SteamPreservation.Com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Tourist RR Links - Spotters Guide

Model RR Supplier Directory
Model Railroad Links

Model RR Product Reviews

RailroadBookstore.com - Railroad Books
Model Railroad Books  - Thomas & Friends


Share this on your favorite Social Network:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2012, 05:57 PM
High Speed Kurt High Speed Kurt is offline
Gone Railin!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 43
Default Code 100 Steel Track vs Nickel Silver

Hello All,

Has anyone used steel track instead of Nickel silver? It seems a bit more cost effective, I am thinking just for hidden staging yards. The only drawback I can seem to find is that its harder to cut and file.

Thanks,

Kurt
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2012, 06:09 PM
Larry Larry is offline
Long Winded Old Fart
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Arcadia, Fl.
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by High Speed Kurt View Post
Hello All,

Has anyone used steel track instead of Nickel silver? It seems a bit more cost effective, I am thinking just for hidden staging yards. The only drawback I can seem to find is that its harder to cut and file.

Thanks,

Kurt
Kurt, I sent you a PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2012, 06:10 PM
D&J RailRoad D&J RailRoad is offline
Professor of HO
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: King George, VA
Posts: 858
Default

The Pasadena MRC uses steel rail on their layout empire. They had it made custom made. Now, I don't know the specific qualities of the material of the steel but it does look good.
__________________
Ken
When ya absolutely positively need model railroad fun, choose the D&J Railroad
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2012, 07:07 PM
MarkVIIIMarc MarkVIIIMarc is offline
Brakeman
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 70
Default

I think it will function just fine. Seems I read it needs cleaned more often. I dunno if I have ever seen a scientific test. After a few more years of experience I will get back with you.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-23-2012, 07:37 PM
Selector's Avatar
Selector Selector is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,892
Default

I think you'll find, if you were to conduct a poll, that the majority of HO scale users over the years, and especially those who have been in the hobby for decades, prefer nickel-silver rails because they require less maintenance. Accounting for a wide variance in usage conditions and ways of keeping it clean, nickel-silver's oxide is much more conductive than is the oxide found on steel rails. They will both oxidize over time, but the N/S rails will work even with the oxidation. Neither rails works worth a darn when they get crudded up with the guck that accumulates on (my) few plastic wheels that I have left, and they won't do very well if dust accumulates to such an extent that the metal tires are being wedged upward and off the rail contact points by a layer of household airborn/airdropped dust.

I have some N/S rails with a nice polish on them, as evinced in my photos, so once either rail rail is polished and used well and often, and painted to look rusty and weathered, I don't think most of us could tell the difference.
__________________
Crandell
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-23-2012, 08:31 PM
Diesel-Electric's Avatar
Diesel-Electric Diesel-Electric is offline
Brakeman
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
Default

Hello there,


I agree with Selector, until a last year or so, I was using only, steel track (LL Powerloc).

When I decided to get NS tracks, I noticed a big difference!

Not only are they easier to maintain, the trains that run on them also perform much better. The additional cost is really worth it!

I've fully changed over to code 83 NS track.


Regards.
__________________
ROOTS-BLOWN 2-CYCLE DIESEL!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-23-2012, 09:38 PM
High Speed Kurt High Speed Kurt is offline
Gone Railin!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 43
Default

Good feedback. I have about 100 pieces of nickel silver flex track, I was looking for a more cost effective solution for the staging areas, but I guess like everything in life, do it once, do it right.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-23-2012, 11:17 PM
Selector's Avatar
Selector Selector is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,892
Default

Kurt, if you have your staging set up so that the locomotive always leads, and it's just a case of nudging the loco onto a N/S and properly powered turnout onto the 'yard lead', I would seriously consider recycling the used or new steel rails. It depends on what kind of staging. If it is multiple loops, then your engines will have to rely on clean rails to get around them to face the lead again for later use. However, if you intend to back whole trains down the lead, and then through a turnout onto individual tracks, it is really only the first few inches of rails on those ladders that need power...the rest of the rails holding the non-electrical part of the train can be anything, even stripwood.

What I mean is, use the steel if it can be used without too much hassle. Save the money. If your staging yard design will be such that you want it handy and easy to use, such as with whole trains turning around on multiple parallel loops that need good electrical contact, you might be better off with the N/S rails. If they will back into multiple parallel tangent tracks, use the steel and get used to nudging the locos forward until they catch electrical track.
__________________
Crandell
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-24-2012, 02:56 AM
cuyama cuyama is online now
Engineer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkVIIIMarc View Post
I think it will function just fine. Seems I read it needs cleaned more often. I dunno if I have ever seen a scientific test.
Steel rusts and the rust is non-conductive. Bad idea for model track, especially in a staging area that is somewhat hard to reach.

Nickle-silver oxidizes also, but the oxide conducts electricity.

There is a reason that the vast majority of modelers who are experienced choose nickel silver and almost none (or zero) choose steel rail.

Steel rail is a false economy.
__________________
Byron Henderson
San Jose, CA
My model RR blog
Layout Design Gallery
My under-construction layout
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-24-2012, 05:02 AM
sd24b sd24b is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: colorado
Posts: 161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by High Speed Kurt View Post
Hello All,

Has anyone used steel track instead of Nickel silver? It seems a bit more cost effective, I am thinking just for hidden staging yards. The only drawback I can seem to find is that its harder to cut and file.

Thanks,

Kurt
I've not used it but have been told it is subject to rusting. Like the old Lionel 0-27 stuff. Phil.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




Model Railroad Bookstore

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PHP_EOL