ModelRailroadForums.com

Go Back   ModelRailroadForums.com > The Project Room > Layout Design and Construction

RailroadForums.com - Railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

RailroadForums.com
RR Forum - Photo Gallery
Railroad Links

ModelRailroadForums.com - Model railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

ModelRailroadForums.com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Model Railroad Links

SteamPreservation.com - Steam and railway preservation discussion forum and photo gallery

SteamPreservation.Com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Tourist RR Links - Spotters Guide

Model RR Supplier Directory
Model Railroad Links

Model RR Product Reviews

RailroadBookstore.com - Railroad Books
Model Railroad Books  - Thomas & Friends


Share this on your favorite Social Network:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2012, 02:46 PM
tjdean tjdean is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Default Need Ideas for HO Layout for 5 x 10ft Table

About to embark on building my first HO layout on a 5x10 table featuring mainline operation. Looking for interesting ideas. Would consider a 4x8 layout that I could expand by 25% to fit my table.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2012, 03:34 PM
k0ncept k0ncept is offline
Switchman
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 37
Default

for a 5x10 I would keep my rolling stock and engines on the short side.. I have had many HO layouts, and the #1 thing that kept killing me was the need for more room.. I enjoy HO, but found I had much more fun with it, when I didnt expect too much... Everytime I started a new HO Layout, I had dreams of huge mainline ops, but EVERY time I would find myself running out of room and needing to expand.. For a 5x10, you have quite a few choices on how you want to lay it out, much more so than a 4x8 would...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2012, 04:22 PM
TheGloriousTachikoma TheGloriousTachikoma is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 146
Default

Unless you're modeling transitional or *early* diesel eras I don't think 5x10 would be enough for 'mainline' operation, simply because of the requirements. Sure, you can have a folded dog bone or oval of double track and even have a 22"R minimum, but what about staging for the trains at each end of your section of modeled mainline track?

Would it be possible for this table to be against a short wall of the room with wings coming off the table on each long wall to hold staging tracks?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2012, 05:21 PM
k0ncept k0ncept is offline
Switchman
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGloriousTachikoma View Post
Unless you're modeling transitional or *early* diesel eras I don't think 5x10 would be enough for 'mainline' operation, simply because of the requirements. Sure, you can have a folded dog bone or oval of double track and even have a 22"R minimum, but what about staging for the trains at each end of your section of modeled mainline track?

Would it be possible for this table to be against a short wall of the room with wings coming off the table on each long wall to hold staging tracks?
That's what I was thinking, if he could do that, then the options would be MUCH better...

After all my years, im now building my first N scale layout, and the only reason I went to N scale was the simple fact I dont have enough room to build the layout I want in HO, and at almost 40 ft of mainline for my N, I feel I have "barely" enough to do what I want, and im sure I will be making many compromises..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2012, 05:48 PM
Selector's Avatar
Selector Selector is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,896
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjdean View Post
About to embark on building my first HO layout on a 5x10 table featuring mainline operation. Looking for interesting ideas. Would consider a 4x8 layout that I could expand by 25% to fit my table.
We all dream of 'big sky' and wide expanses when it comes to our layouts. If you can remember that those characteristics were trouble for budding railroad companies who hoped for high densities of customers in short runs of track, but who nevertheless had to bite the coin and spend big to get to distant markets, you might be on your own way to understanding how to look at the space you have. Said another way, what is the purpose of your railroad? What do you want it to do or to represent as an earner of revenue and a payer of reasonable dividends to investors? When you picture yourself having fun, what is your experience to date with model trains?

I think I could design a decent layout for a 5X10, but I know now that there are other considerations such as how will I reach everything in the middle without knocking over stuff near my steadying hand or reaching elbow? Where will I even stand? Would it be better to have a three sided shelf of sorts instead of a loop, or do I have to have a loop because I know I will enjoy just watching the trains most of the time? I can make a nice loop in 5X10. I could even place a diagonal across it to achieve reversals so that the train(s) needn't run clockwise all the time...or the other way.

Atlas has public track plans, and John Armstrong published many in his great book, Track Planning for Realistic Operation. It is available at Kalmbach Publishing.

Carl Arendt's site is a great one. http://www.carendt.com/microplans/index.html
__________________
Crandell
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2012, 05:52 PM
TheGloriousTachikoma TheGloriousTachikoma is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by k0ncept View Post
That's what I was thinking, if he could do that, then the options would be MUCH better...

After all my years, im now building my first N scale layout, and the only reason I went to N scale was the simple fact I dont have enough room to build the layout I want in HO, and at almost 40 ft of mainline for my N, I feel I have "barely" enough to do what I want, and im sure I will be making many compromises..
Well, my interest is more in the type of stuff a class-II would be doing. some bridge route stuff but a focus more on switching medium-large customers along the route.


TJ, I did some playing around and think i have something workable to show you.

Arguably, an oval will just not cut it, period. But to illustrate how crowded mainline ops on a table are, here is a double track folded dogbone in 5x10 with 22" and 24" radius curves.

The second image is with the plan reduced to a single track with a passing siding at each end of the 'bone'. I've hidden the 'back middle' of the dogbone under a tunnel and used it to house ramps that would go down into staging yards underneath the table. This would enable whole trains to be stored and then brought out to meet/chase/what-have-you along the exposed mainline. Grades are 2-3% in order to get at least 4" of clearance at the big bridge.

The last image is of the plan as rendered in 3D, to show what it would look like.


(ALL images rendered in SCARM)

Last edited by TheGloriousTachikoma; 09-30-2012 at 05:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2012, 06:14 PM
gregc's Avatar
gregc gregc is offline
Apprentice Modeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: somerset, nj
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjdean View Post
About to embark on building my first HO layout on a 5x10 table featuring mainline operation. Looking for interesting ideas. Would consider a 4x8 layout that I could expand by 25% to fit my table.
http://www.layoutvision.com/id28.html

greg
__________________
greg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2012, 07:29 PM
Iron Horseman's Avatar
Iron Horseman Iron Horseman is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjdean View Post
About to embark on building my first HO layout on a 5x10 table featuring mainline operation. Looking for interesting ideas. Would consider a 4x8 layout that I could expand by 25% to fit my table.
Actually that is exactly what I was going to recommend when I read the title of your thread. Track down one of the thousands of 4x8 layouts out there and just relax it to the 5x10 size.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2012, 08:58 PM
cuyama cuyama is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 253
Default 5X9 out and back in HO

This HO 5X9 track plan doesn't support "mainline" operation as most would describe it, but provides some interesting operation and might offer some ideas.

Single-track version



Double-track

__________________
Byron Henderson
San Jose, CA
My model RR blog
Layout Design Gallery
My under-construction layout
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-02-2012, 02:10 AM
Armchair Armchair is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Yuma,AZ
Posts: 111
Default 5'x10' Layout

Stretching a 4'x8' to 5'x10' works, but does create some unexpected problems. Our little club, "Rail Roadrunners of Yuma" did just that with an old folded dog-bone, "Pidgin Creek and Thawville" We went to 23" radius and 1.8% grades and found some items moved around a little.
See my blog for lots of details and pics. http://armchairmodeling.blogspot.com

Armchair
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




Model Railroad Bookstore

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PHP_EOL