![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Active Topics | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
![]() |
ModelRailroadForums.com |
![]() |
SteamPreservation.Com |
| Share this on your favorite Social Network: |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Okay I know this can be an open-ended question to some but I am ready to lay down my first track work in my switching yard. I have always assumed #6 is what I'd be using but I'm thinking #7 might look a little more realistic. Is there much difference visually between these sizes for a small switching yard?
Regards, Stephen
__________________
Stephen |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would go with #6's. They can handle most anything, but the only way to get truly realistic yard trackage is to handlay your switches. #6's are a good substitute though.
__________________
Tom Carter Railroad Training Services Stockton, California www.railroadtrainingservices.com tomwcarter(AT)railroadtrainingservices.com |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
#6's are better than say 5's or 4.5's, if you're going to run 86' Hi-Cubes and alike, or long wheelbase engines. In my mind it sort of depends on the space you have. Try a few #6's with a few of your long cars, and see how they work.
In the real world, highspeed mainline crossovers are like #20, or so I've been told. #8's for yards? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
To me the yard turnouts should be smaller than the mainline turnouts. I would use #5 as a minimum in a freight yard and #6 in a passenger yard. My longest freight cars are 65' and my passenger cars are 80'.
I started this layout with #7 turnouts on the mainline and have built new trackage with #10's since they were introduced. I wish all of the mainline turnouts were #10's. I plan to replace any failures with #10's were possible. Glenn
__________________
Glenn Samuel Waltzing Creek & Western Railroad N Scale Mobile, AL |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for your quick replies, guys. I should have disclosed my rolling stock types. For locos I have 3 MP15-DC switchers, a couple of GP40's (mainly to bring in the occasional short line cut). In regards to freight most are 50' boxcars and some of the 17,500G corn syrup tankers.
I will be getting someone to build my turnouts using the Fast Tracks system, and I agree they do look supurb!!
__________________
Stephen Last edited by bn-1000; 09-18-2012 at 08:23 AM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
While I'm not a civil engineer, I think turnout number is a function of car length, train length, as well as velocity thru the diverging route, but I could be wrong.
Having said that, I'm currently planning an HO layout in a space of 26' x28-34'. Even with that amount of space, in the freight yards, I'm still using Atlas #4's. Mainline crossovers will be #6's, with a few 8's in spots where they'll be passenger trains taking diverging routes at decent speed(medium speed), if they'll fit. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5s should be plenty
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Always a trade off between space and looks.
#5s have a minimum radius of around 26", #6s around 43". However it's not a very long section of curve. Since my space was limited I went with #5 for yards, #6 for main line. For reference the minimum main line radius is 30". |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks all. Some great responses there. I'm going #6 for the yard and a #7 off the mainline.
fcwilt, you're correct in saying it's a real trade-off between space and appearance. My layout measures 11 foot long x 18 inches deep. I'll post the schematic in a new thread shortly.
__________________
Stephen |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Im running more modern equipment so i went with #6 and #8s. In a yard you are traveling at slow speeds so #4-#5 would work fine... alot has to do with what amount of room you have to work with.
I always try and use the bigger switches especially on mainlines. Spurs and what not a person can get by using #4... |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|