ModelRailroadForums.com

Go Back   ModelRailroadForums.com > The Project Room > Layout Design and Construction

RailroadForums.com - Railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

RailroadForums.com
RR Forum - Photo Gallery
Railroad Links

ModelRailroadForums.com - Model railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

ModelRailroadForums.com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Model Railroad Links

SteamPreservation.com - Steam and railway preservation discussion forum and photo gallery

SteamPreservation.Com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Tourist RR Links - Spotters Guide

Model RR Supplier Directory
Model Railroad Links

Model RR Product Reviews

RailroadBookstore.com - Railroad Books
Model Railroad Books  - Thomas & Friends


Share this on your favorite Social Network:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2012, 01:09 AM
bn-1000's Avatar
bn-1000 bn-1000 is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 122
Default What size turnouts for a yard?

Okay I know this can be an open-ended question to some but I am ready to lay down my first track work in my switching yard. I have always assumed #6 is what I'd be using but I'm thinking #7 might look a little more realistic. Is there much difference visually between these sizes for a small switching yard?

Regards,
Stephen
__________________
Stephen
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-18-2012, 01:15 AM
cct70's Avatar
cct70 cct70 is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 273
Default

I would go with #6's. They can handle most anything, but the only way to get truly realistic yard trackage is to handlay your switches. #6's are a good substitute though.
__________________
Tom Carter
Railroad Training Services
Stockton, California
www.railroadtrainingservices.com
tomwcarter(AT)railroadtrainingservices.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-18-2012, 01:39 AM
otiscnj's Avatar
otiscnj otiscnj is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 587
Default

#6's are better than say 5's or 4.5's, if you're going to run 86' Hi-Cubes and alike, or long wheelbase engines. In my mind it sort of depends on the space you have. Try a few #6's with a few of your long cars, and see how they work.

In the real world, highspeed mainline crossovers are like #20, or so I've been told. #8's for yards?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-18-2012, 01:42 AM
WCWBrassHat WCWBrassHat is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 319
Default

To me the yard turnouts should be smaller than the mainline turnouts. I would use #5 as a minimum in a freight yard and #6 in a passenger yard. My longest freight cars are 65' and my passenger cars are 80'.

I started this layout with #7 turnouts on the mainline and have built new trackage with #10's since they were introduced. I wish all of the mainline turnouts were #10's. I plan to replace any failures with #10's were possible.

Glenn
__________________
Glenn Samuel
Waltzing Creek & Western Railroad
N Scale
Mobile, AL
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-18-2012, 01:57 AM
bn-1000's Avatar
bn-1000 bn-1000 is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 122
Default

Thanks for your quick replies, guys. I should have disclosed my rolling stock types. For locos I have 3 MP15-DC switchers, a couple of GP40's (mainly to bring in the occasional short line cut). In regards to freight most are 50' boxcars and some of the 17,500G corn syrup tankers.

I will be getting someone to build my turnouts using the Fast Tracks system, and I agree they do look supurb!!
__________________
Stephen

Last edited by bn-1000; 09-18-2012 at 08:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-18-2012, 02:02 AM
otiscnj's Avatar
otiscnj otiscnj is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 587
Default

While I'm not a civil engineer, I think turnout number is a function of car length, train length, as well as velocity thru the diverging route, but I could be wrong.

Having said that, I'm currently planning an HO layout in a space of 26' x28-34'. Even with that amount of space, in the freight yards, I'm still using Atlas #4's. Mainline crossovers will be #6's, with a few 8's in spots where they'll be passenger trains taking diverging routes at decent speed(medium speed), if they'll fit.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-18-2012, 03:13 AM
GenSet GenSet is offline
Switchman
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 42
Default

#5s should be plenty
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-18-2012, 06:03 AM
fcwilt fcwilt is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 101
Default

Always a trade off between space and looks.

#5s have a minimum radius of around 26", #6s around 43".

However it's not a very long section of curve.

Since my space was limited I went with #5 for yards, #6 for main line.

For reference the minimum main line radius is 30".
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-18-2012, 08:25 AM
bn-1000's Avatar
bn-1000 bn-1000 is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 122
Default

Thanks all. Some great responses there. I'm going #6 for the yard and a #7 off the mainline.

fcwilt, you're correct in saying it's a real trade-off between space and appearance. My layout measures 11 foot long x 18 inches deep. I'll post the schematic in a new thread shortly.
__________________
Stephen
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-18-2012, 11:30 AM
joed2323 joed2323 is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: upper peninsula Michigan
Posts: 511
Default

Im running more modern equipment so i went with #6 and #8s. In a yard you are traveling at slow speeds so #4-#5 would work fine... alot has to do with what amount of room you have to work with.

I always try and use the bigger switches especially on mainlines. Spurs and what not a person can get by using #4...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




Model Railroad Bookstore

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PHP_EOL