ModelRailroadForums.com

Go Back   ModelRailroadForums.com > Scale Specific Discussions > N Scale

RailroadForums.com - Railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

RailroadForums.com
RR Forum - Photo Gallery
Railroad Links

ModelRailroadForums.com - Model railroad discussion forum and photo gallery

ModelRailroadForums.com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Model Railroad Links

SteamPreservation.com - Steam and railway preservation discussion forum and photo gallery

SteamPreservation.Com
Forum - Photo Gallery
Tourist RR Links - Spotters Guide

Model RR Supplier Directory
Model Railroad Links

Model RR Product Reviews

RailroadBookstore.com - Railroad Books
Model Railroad Books  - Thomas & Friends


Share this on your favorite Social Network:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2012, 09:57 AM
cmaceeepc cmaceeepc is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 113
Default My Big Shed layout

Hi Guys

Sorry for the delay in posting - all the normal reasons work, life, wife
Anyway during my break I have decided to build a new layout in my big shed.

At the rear of the shed I will have an area 3.1m x 3.4m.

With this area in mind my first idea is as attached


This layout consists of 2 levels connected by 2 helix (shelf level approx 400 above main deck)
Main Deck


Upper deck


With some free time I have been able to start on the first of my helix's.
Firstly to find out how to build one, Xtracad gives some details but in the end used "Helix Calculator" to get some measurements.
http://ezbizwebsite.com/helix calculator

So it began with cutting the rings - full rings - three and a half
Cut rings and joined with biscuits
next I built temporary frame and started spacing - not once but three times to get it right - 1. Not enough turns 2. I forgot to allow for thickness of the ply on three legs 3. Still got it wrong on one leg
Once this was right I added some spacer bars to keep from warping and it is now as you see in the photos




Next I will start the benches

Please any advise is welcome

Be good

cmaceeepc
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-13-2012, 10:38 AM
Burlington Bob's Avatar
Burlington Bob Burlington Bob is online now
Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,042
Default

Nice and ambitious project, but the biggest concern I would have is the grade percentage and curve radius. What scale is this, N? The addition of a tight radius curve to a steep grade is a recipe for trouble and will be compounded by longer trains. Before you get too far along you should test your helix design to see if it is workable. I have never built one myself, but the grade does seem very steep to me from the pictures. Pictures can be deceiving though! Good luck!
__________________
Everywhere West!

"N", the Normal scale!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-13-2012, 10:50 AM
cmaceeepc cmaceeepc is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 113
Default

Burlington Bob

My idea of fun is N scale
This is my largest layout so far 1st 6' x 4', the second 4' x 3'

This layout will combine a lot of ideas I have seen

Details of the helix's are
The operational radius is 350mm
Grade of 2.1
Length of Helix 7m
seperation 114mm


I await your advice

cmaceeepc
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2012, 11:07 AM
railfan's Avatar
railfan railfan is offline
on the point
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: central ohio
Posts: 1,228
Default

Nice looking helix.....and who doesn't like biscuits?

Mike
__________________
EMD F-unit enthusiast
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2012, 12:04 PM
Larry Larry is offline
Long Winded Old Fart
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Arcadia, Fl.
Posts: 4,040
Default

Burlington Bob is right about that Helix. It's way to steep even for HO. Most Helix's I've seen are only 4" apart for HO on ea. level. For N they would probably only be about 2" apart or less. That Helix might be OK for O scale if it was 6ft across.
Just my thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-13-2012, 11:42 PM
WCWBrassHat WCWBrassHat is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 319
Default

Your math on the helix doesn't seem right. Let see if I understand correctly. Your radius is 350mm or 13.78". The distance between the layers of the helix is 114mm or 4.49"

%Grade is defined as rise (114) over run (2 x PI (3.1416) x radius(350)) x 100 = 114 / 2199 x 100 = 5.18%

Your radius is a bit on the tight side. You need to consider what engines and cars you plan to run. Large articulated steam engines and 80' or longer freight or passenger cars may cause some problems.

A grade over 5% will not be workable as an engine will pull very few if any cars up the grade particularly in conjunction with the 350mm radius curves. A grade of 2% may not give enough clearance for all rolling stock.

If you cut a slot on your uprights at 50mm spacing so that it catches the edge of your helix subroadbed you won't need the support under the roadbed. You will need to add additional uprights on the inside of the helix.

Hope this helps!
Glenn
__________________
Glenn Samuel
Waltzing Creek & Western Railroad
N Scale
Mobile, AL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2012, 11:35 AM
cmaceeepc cmaceeepc is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 113
Default

Guys

Your valued advice has proved enlightening.
Following your advice I rechecked and my calc's and asumptions and they were flawed.
As such I attach some new calcs

Please advise if I am on the right track before I rip into any more ply


cmaceeepc
Attached Files
File Type: pdf helix calc test.pdf (9.8 KB, 77 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2012, 10:24 PM
WCWBrassHat WCWBrassHat is offline
Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 319
Default

cmaceeepc,

Your calculatons are now basicly right except the grade should be calculated on the track center line not the outside circumference. It bumps your grade up to 2.2%.

The larger radius will make a big difference in your operations.

Glenn
__________________
Glenn Samuel
Waltzing Creek & Western Railroad
N Scale
Mobile, AL
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-16-2012, 01:10 AM
cmaceeepc cmaceeepc is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WCWBrassHat View Post
cmaceeepc,

Your calculatons are now basicly right except the grade should be calculated on the track center line not the outside circumference. It bumps your grade up to 2.2%.

The larger radius will make a big difference in your operations.

Glenn
Had a closer look at the calculator and found it was set for G scale
revised the base equations to suit N scale and hey presto same rise, grade 1.83 (at track centre), seperation 2.75", 5.5 rings

I will do a mock up on the weekend and let you know how it goes


cmaceeepc
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-22-2012, 10:50 AM
cmaceeepc cmaceeepc is offline
Conductor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 113
Default Progress on Helix

Wow this is proving to be a big fiddly job, but so far after some advice from those most learnned, I have designed my helix, created a jig, marked up and cut enough segments to build the rings required.

I have biscuited and glued 3 full rings and one drying in the jig, a couple of days to complete the construction of the rings and to start the assembly.

Yes they are bigger than I had originaly concieved but isnt that the same as all layouts!

here are a couple of pictures of the process line

The jig


The segments


the rings (the builders square is 600mm long)


Will post again when I have done some more

and thanks for the advise on the Helix calcs - it really helped sort it out


cmaceeepc
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




Model Railroad Bookstore

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PHP_EOL