The impression I have is that cameras with very short focal length -- as this one appears to have -- get much higher depth of field, which is also what you see in the sample photos. The advantage of a good-quality conventional DSLR has been that it can take much higher megapixel photos, which means they're more conventionally publishable. I think this difference has gradually gotten less important. On one hand, much lower resolution photos are just fine on the web, but it looks like the short focal length point-and-shoot type cameras are also getting steadily higher resolution. As far as I understand this, it means that the F stop exposure is less and less important.
As of half a dozen years ago when I got a DSLR, the conventional advice from Pelle Soeborg at MR, for instance, was to get one with at least 8 MP that would get at least F 22. I'm just not sure how far this applies these days.
If someone can correct or clarify this, it would be great.